T00 bad it's hidden (from most of us) behind a subscription wall. Mario Loyola's commentary in the weekend Wall Street Journal is encouraging reading:
With Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad visiting Venezuela today, it might be a good time to consider another "change in course" for U.S. policy. The isolation of Cuba, a legacy of the Cold War, is pushing that country closer to America's most dangerous enemies.
In a recent open letter to President Bush, several major Cuban dissident groups called for an end to U.S. restrictions on travel and remittances to Cuba. Now joining their call is the Miami-based Cuban Consensus, a coalition of 20 pro-democracy groups including the "hard-line" Cuban-American National Foundation.
Loyola, a regular contributor to the National Review, points out what has been obvious for a long time: the U.S. sanctions on Cuba are counterproductive. How is it that the strategy of trade and engagement that helped bring about the end of the Soviet empire and transform China is held to be inapplicable to Cuba? The answer lies in domestic politics, and specifically the politics of Florida. Politicians competing for the support of the Cuban emigre community there keep trying to outdo each other in ratcheting up the anti-Cuban rhetoric. This has been a factor primarily in Republican politics there, so it is significant that both the emigre organizations and their GOP supporters are starting to face reality.
Loyola is right that it makes sense for the U.S. to engage Castro's regime, not to isolate it. He gets to that conclusion for some suspect reasons--chiefly, an inordinate fear of Venezuela's Hugh Chavez--but the fact that someone with his right wing cred is on board the sanity train is good news indeed.
Nearly fifty years of efforts to isolate Cuba in hopes that its people will overthrow their government and bring back the crooks who ran it before have failed. Some people are finally admitting, now that Fidel Castro has been out of the picture for close to six months, that their strategy has failed, and it's time to try something else.
It's unfortunate, though by no means surprising, that the Wall Street Journal's commentator doesn't recognize that, along with its various problems, Cuba has some things which we can learn from: totally free health care and education, for example.
We really need to allow the people of the United States, all of them, to be free to see Cuba for themselves.
Thanks very much for sharing this commentator's views.
Best wishes,
Walter Lippmann
Los Angeles, California
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CubaNews/
Posted by: Walter Lippmann | January 14, 2007 at 05:13 PM
Thanks for your comments. As you probably have gathered, I am in general agreement with them. I don't overlook the Castro regime's horrible record on human rights, civil liberties and representative democracy. I will be thoroughly glad to see the dictatorship there come to an end. But as you correctly point out, there are some things the Castro regime has done fairly well--or even very well, considering the handicaps they labor under. When the post-Castro era begins, the U.S. would do well to ensure that those things are continued. JFT
Posted by: James F. Trumm | January 16, 2007 at 02:53 PM